Border Patrol Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Border Patrol exam with interactive quizzes and detailed explanations. Utilize our flashcards and multiple choice questions to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the material. Ace your test with confidence!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What can be inferred from "If a person is not guilty of a felony, that person has not been convicted of a murder"?

This is a valid conclusion
This is an invalid conclusion
Only applicable to certain cases
It cannot be inferred

The correct answer is: This is a valid conclusion

The correct answer hinges on the logical relationship between the concepts of guilt and conviction related to felonies, specifically murder. If someone is stated to not be guilty of a felony, it implies that they do not possess the legal status of having committed a serious crime, which includes murder. Since murder is classified as a felony, the assertion that a person is not guilty of a felony directly leads to the conclusion that they have not been convicted of murder. A conviction of murder would inherently mean that the individual was guilty of a felony, making it impossible for them to simultaneously be described as not guilty of felonies in general. This reasoning highlights the valid logical connection: if one does not fall under the category of felonies, they must also not be involved in its most severe subset, murder. Consequently, the conclusion is valid based on the provided premises.